The discussion about whether people should require early in a country
like Bangladesh where unemployment is too high or people should be
permitted to continue their jobs long as they can and are willing
to because there lots of scarcity of able and experienced work force in
it is a matter of controversy. I am presenting my viewpoints below in a
very pleasing manner.
Firstly , Bangladesh is widely known as the most poverty-stricken country where the unemployment rate is so high that other people of other nations cannot imagine. In this context the government and non-government employees should get retirement early.
Secondly, retire assessment should be useful in Bangladesh intended to ease the workload and promote opportunities between manual workers and non-manual workers.
Thirdly, in Bangladesh where pressures reinforce the significance of young generation and the provision of job facilities for the young, where we need to consider with due care the social implications of policies designed to encourage older workers to quiet employment.Currently, there is a great pressure on older workers to retire early to free jobs for the younger workers. Early retire with reasonable facilities is said to bring welfare gains particularly for manual workers and those in poor health.
One study has showed that long-term economic and social damage from high levels of youth unemployment is huge. It's economically sensible to keep unemployment unnecessarily high for unnecessarily long should be rejected any how except few cases. In this global world of ICT and free trade market workers can be trained up effortlessly and speedily, so susceptible laborer are more available and not inadequate.
More men who are able to retire with incomes sufficient to allow them to enjoy an enhanced later life or weather the pressure for older workers to make way for younger ones is, in fact, leading to hidden poverty among those aged 60-65. However the early retired are more likely to have adequate incomes with few exceptions in these fields early retirement should not be made effective than the existing unemployed.
Firstly , Bangladesh is widely known as the most poverty-stricken country where the unemployment rate is so high that other people of other nations cannot imagine. In this context the government and non-government employees should get retirement early.
Secondly, retire assessment should be useful in Bangladesh intended to ease the workload and promote opportunities between manual workers and non-manual workers.
Thirdly, in Bangladesh where pressures reinforce the significance of young generation and the provision of job facilities for the young, where we need to consider with due care the social implications of policies designed to encourage older workers to quiet employment.Currently, there is a great pressure on older workers to retire early to free jobs for the younger workers. Early retire with reasonable facilities is said to bring welfare gains particularly for manual workers and those in poor health.
One study has showed that long-term economic and social damage from high levels of youth unemployment is huge. It's economically sensible to keep unemployment unnecessarily high for unnecessarily long should be rejected any how except few cases. In this global world of ICT and free trade market workers can be trained up effortlessly and speedily, so susceptible laborer are more available and not inadequate.
More men who are able to retire with incomes sufficient to allow them to enjoy an enhanced later life or weather the pressure for older workers to make way for younger ones is, in fact, leading to hidden poverty among those aged 60-65. However the early retired are more likely to have adequate incomes with few exceptions in these fields early retirement should not be made effective than the existing unemployed.
